web-checkvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| web-check | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in OSINT | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 280 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +373 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+373 stars in 30 days).
web-check details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep web-check, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with