Wazuhvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wazuh | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 478 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +493 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Wazuh scores 80/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Wazuh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Wazuh is growing faster right now (+493 stars in 30 days).
Wazuh details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Wazuh, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with