WastebinvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wastebin | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 19 in Pastebins | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 880 | 53 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +322 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+322 stars in 30 days).
Wastebin details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep Wastebin, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with