WakupatorvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wakupator | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 22 in Home Server | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Wakupator details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Wakupator, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with