virtualtabletopvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| virtualtabletop | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 14 in Gaming | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 320 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | monthly-2026-10 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Zero-K scores 62/100 against 49/100 for virtualtabletop, so it is the safer default.
virtualtabletop ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; virtualtabletop needs more configuration.
Zero-K is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
virtualtabletop details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep virtualtabletop, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with