Virtual Radar ServervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Virtual Radar Server | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 315 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 49/100 for Virtual Radar Server, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Virtual Radar Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Virtual Radar Server is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Virtual Radar Server details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Virtual Radar Server, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with