verdacciovsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| verdaccio | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Package Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 17 956 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
verdaccio details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep verdaccio, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with