VaultwardenvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Vaultwarden | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in Password Managers | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 69 884 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 764 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.37.4 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Vaultwarden scores 89/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
Vaultwarden ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Vaultwarden needs more configuration.
Vaultwarden is growing faster right now (+1 764 stars in 30 days).
Vaultwarden details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Vaultwarden, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with