AliasVaultvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AliasVault | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 28 in Password Managers | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 3 330 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.31.1 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
AliasVault scores 68/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
AliasVault ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; AliasVault needs more configuration.
AliasVault is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
AliasVault details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep AliasVault, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with