UUSEC WAFvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 17 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
UUSEC WAF details →World Monitor details →