BunkerWebvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 11 132 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with