UUSEC WAFvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 53 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +329 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).
UUSEC WAF details →WindowsinDocker details →