UUSEC WAFvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 33 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+198 stars in 30 days).
UUSEC WAF details →Warpgate details →