UrocissavsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urocissa | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 300 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
Urocissa details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep Urocissa, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with