UrocissavsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urocissa | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 300 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 8 |
| Latest release | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Urocissa details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Urocissa, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with