Urbitvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
zookeeper is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with