UrbitvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | hoon | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with