Urbitvs心潮动态心智系统
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | 心潮动态心智系统 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.
If you want the quickest setup, 心潮动态心智系统 is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →心潮动态心智系统 details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep 心潮动态心智系统, compare it with