Urbitvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with