Urbitvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 3 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with