UrbitvsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →WPS Office details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep WPS Office, compare it with