UrbitvsWiki.js
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 29 103 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +146 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Wiki.js scores 77/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Wiki.js ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Wiki.js is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Wiki.js details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Wiki.js, compare it with