UrbitvsWeTTY
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | WeTTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 20 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WeTTY scores 68/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
WeTTY is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →WeTTY details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep WeTTY, compare it with