Urbitvswarp-docker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | warp-docker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #24 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 1 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 57/100 for warp-docker, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for warp-docker.
If you want the quickest setup, warp-docker is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →warp-docker details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep warp-docker, compare it with