uptime-kumavszoneless
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | zoneless | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 10 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 | 574 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.1.0 · 23 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 50/100 for zoneless, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for zoneless.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; zoneless needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →zoneless details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep zoneless, compare it with