uptime-kumavsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 93 043 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 249 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 249 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with