uptime-kumavsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 93 041 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 294 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with