uptime-kumavsWeTTY
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | WeTTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 93 040 | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 246 | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 68/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.
WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →WeTTY details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep WeTTY, compare it with