uptime-kumavsWallos
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | Wallos | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Finance |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 | 8 763 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | +186 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 36 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v5.10.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for Wallos, so it is the safer default.
Wallos ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Wallos needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →Wallos details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep Wallos, compare it with