UpptimevsZealot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Zealot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 1 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.
Zealot ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Zealot needs more configuration.
Upptime details →Zealot details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Zealot, compare it with