Upptimevswiki-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | wiki-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #27 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 157 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Markdown | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for wiki-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; wiki-server needs more configuration.
Upptime details →wiki-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep wiki-server, compare it with