UpptimevsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 2 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; WebCodex needs more configuration.
Upptime details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with