uncompressedvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uncompressed | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
uncompressed details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep uncompressed, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with