uncompressedvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uncompressed | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #71 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.
uncompressed details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep uncompressed, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with