MediaMTXvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with