unbagrndvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; wger needs more configuration.
wger is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
unbagrnd details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with