unbagrndvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 29 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
unbagrnd details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with