unbagrndvsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| unbagrnd | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 178 | 5 560 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Unison scores 65/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.
unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Unison.
If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.
Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
unbagrnd details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep unbagrnd, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with