Umbraco CMSvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 5 277 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 31 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for Umbraco CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with