Umbraco CMSvsytdlp_web_player
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | ytdlp_web_player | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 8 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.
If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →ytdlp_web_player details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep ytdlp_web_player, compare it with