Umbraco CMSvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 11 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with