Umbraco CMSvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 18 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with