Umbraco CMSvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with