uMapvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uMap | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 628 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
uMap scores 64/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.
If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
uMap is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
uMap details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep uMap, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with