UmamivsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umami | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 21 in Web analytics | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 39 757 | 2 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +776 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Zot Registry.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
Umami details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep Umami, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with