TypstvsWallabag
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typst | Wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 56 870 | 13 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +51 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Wallabag, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
Typst details →Wallabag details →
Swap a project
Keep Typst, compare it with
Keep Wallabag, compare it with