CookCLIvsWallabag
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 13 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +51 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.
CookCLI details →Wallabag details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Wallabag, compare it with