TypstvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typst | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 56 869 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
Typst details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Typst, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with