TypeTypevsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TypeType | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 53 765 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +370 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).
TypeType details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep TypeType, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with