Typesensevswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typesense | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 27 063 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +470 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 15 |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
Typesense details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep Typesense, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with